Overview
Gnosis (GNO) and Genius (GENIUS) sit at different layers of the crypto stack. At current prices ($104.88 vs $0.330057), market leadership still favors Gnosis on capitalization, while 24h tape is led by Genius.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | GNO | GENIUS |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $104.88 | $0.330057 |
| Market Cap | $276.84M | $110.69M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $709,646.00 | $8.07M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 130.00 | 243.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | GNO | GENIUS |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.10% | +2.30% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | GNO | GENIUS |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Automated technical notes for this pair highlight bearish conditions on GNO and bearish on GENIUS. Volatility differences can amplify short-term gaps.
Fundamentals
| Metric | GNO | GENIUS |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Gnosis
Genius
Pros and cons
Pros of Gnosis
- Higher ranking for Gnosis can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Market-cap scale on Gnosis may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Composite PEPS readings for Gnosis can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of Gnosis
- Large-cap status for Gnosis can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- When dominance narratives fade, Gnosis can lag hotter rotation names.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Gnosis harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of Genius
- Narrative optionality around Genius can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Active volume bursts on GENIUS sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Genius can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of Genius
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Genius more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
Across winners above, no single coin dominates every column. Prefer scenarios: trend continuation favors the side with aligned momentum; mean-reversion favors the side stretched on RSI.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. Gnosis holds market-cap $276.84M and rank #130; Genius shows $110.69M and #243. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch Genius. Where durability matters, watch Gnosis. AI composite scores (57.90/57.90) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, Gnosis or Genius?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Gnosis leads on market cap today, while Genius leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, GNO or GENIUS?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Gnosis and Genius.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Genius currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Genius, but longer windows can disagree.