Overview
Investors searching ATOM vs GNO usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. Cosmos Hub prints $1.27 (+4.02%) while Gnosis is at $104.97 (+1.30%), with volume edge currently on Cosmos Hub.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | ATOM | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.27 | $104.97 |
| Market Cap | $723.29M | $277.08M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.46M | $1.01M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 85.00 | 130.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +4.22% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | ATOM | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +4.02% | +1.30% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | ATOM | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 18.97 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 0.05 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 51.19 | 21.33 |
| Support | — | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1.61 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | — | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Relative technical health favors reading both charts side by side. AI scores (49.50 vs 58.40) summarize PEPS modules, but supports and resistances still decide invalidation.
Fundamentals
| Metric | ATOM | GNO |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 0.00 | — |
| Github activity | 1,299.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Cosmos Hub
Gnosis
Pros and cons
Pros of Cosmos Hub
- ATOM often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Higher ranking for Cosmos Hub can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Market-cap scale on Cosmos Hub may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of Cosmos Hub
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Indicator stacks on Cosmos Hub may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- When dominance narratives fade, Cosmos Hub can lag hotter rotation names.
- Crowded positioning around ATOM sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of Gnosis
- Gnosis can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Narrative optionality around Gnosis can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- PEPS tracking for Gnosis still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of Gnosis
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Higher volatility on GNO cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Trend failures on Gnosis often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
If you weight capitalization and liquidity, Cosmos Hub looks sturdier; if you weight 24h tape, Cosmos Hub is ahead. A balanced view treats both as incomplete signals.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put Cosmos Hub at $1.27 and Gnosis at $104.97. Relative performance over 24h (Cosmos Hub) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, Cosmos Hub or Gnosis?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Cosmos Hub leads on market cap today, while Cosmos Hub leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, ATOM or GNO?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Cosmos Hub and Gnosis.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Cosmos Hub currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Cosmos Hub, but longer windows can disagree.