Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means GNO and ATH are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | GNO | ATH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $104.04 | $1,856.75 |
| Market Cap | $274.67M | $76.92M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $99,194.36 | $5.40M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 129.00 | 299.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | GNO | ATH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -0.90% | -3.00% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | GNO | ATH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across GNO and ATH, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | GNO | ATH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
GNO
ATH
Pros and cons
Pros of GNO
- Market-cap scale on GNO may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Higher ranking for GNO can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- GNO often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of GNO
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Crowded positioning around GNO sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Large-cap status for GNO can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of ATH
- If technical momentum aligns, ATH may outperform on medium-term windows.
- PEPS tracking for ATH still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Narrative optionality around ATH can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- ATH can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of ATH
- Higher volatility on ATH cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Trend failures on ATH often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. GNO and ATH can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: GNO (GNO) trades near $104.04 with a -0.90% day move, while ATH (ATH) is around $1,856.75 (-3.00%). Volume leadership currently sits with ATH, and market-cap leadership with GNO. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 49.02/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, GNO or ATH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. GNO leads on market cap today, while GNO leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, GNO or ATH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both GNO and ATH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. ATH currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is GNO, but longer windows can disagree.