Overview
Investors searching FDUSD vs SEI usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. FDUSD prints $0.998200 (+0.03%) while Sei is at $0.041350 (+1.17%), with volume edge currently on FDUSD.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | FDUSD | SEI |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.998200 | $0.041350 |
| Market Cap | $349.22M | $301.91M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $11.15M | $798,340.37 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 116.00 | 129.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | FDUSD | SEI |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.03% | +1.17% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | FDUSD | SEI |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, FDUSD shows RSI 49.02 with trend bias bearish, while Sei sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | FDUSD | SEI |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | 0.00 |
| Github activity | — | 0.00 |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
FDUSD
Sei
Pros and cons
Pros of FDUSD
- FDUSD has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- FDUSD often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Composite PEPS readings for FDUSD can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of FDUSD
- When dominance narratives fade, FDUSD can lag hotter rotation names.
- Large-cap status for FDUSD can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of Sei
- Diversifying versus FDUSD with Sei can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Sei can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Active volume bursts on SEI sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of Sei
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Sei more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for Sei.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to FDUSD, while short-term performance leans toward Sei. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put FDUSD at $0.998200 and Sei at $0.041350. Relative performance over 24h (Sei) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, FDUSD or Sei?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. FDUSD leads on market cap today, while Sei leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, FDUSD or SEI?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both FDUSD and Sei.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. FDUSD currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Sei, but longer windows can disagree.