Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means Filecoin and ATH are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | FIL | ATH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.720200 | $1,856.75 |
| Market Cap | $562.65M | $76.92M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $3.96M | $5.40M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 91.00 | 299.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +5.67% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | FIL | ATH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.11% | -3.00% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | FIL | ATH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 42.21 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 0.04 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 24.60 | 21.33 |
| Support | 0.67 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 0.82 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | — | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for FIL/ATH currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | FIL | ATH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 0.00 | — |
| Github activity | 0.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Filecoin
ATH
Pros and cons
Pros of Filecoin
- Higher ranking for Filecoin can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- FIL often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of Filecoin
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Filecoin harder simply because it is more visible.
- Crowded positioning around FIL sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Large-cap status for Filecoin can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of ATH
- Diversifying versus Filecoin with ATH can change portfolio factor exposure.
- If technical momentum aligns, ATH may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Narrative optionality around ATH can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of ATH
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for ATH.
- Trend failures on ATH often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Higher volatility on ATH cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave ATH more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for Filecoin on size and ATH on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. Filecoin holds market-cap $562.65M and rank #91; ATH shows $76.92M and #299. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch ATH. Where durability matters, watch Filecoin. AI composite scores (45.40/57.90) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, Filecoin or ATH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Filecoin leads on market cap today, while Filecoin leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, FIL or ATH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Filecoin and ATH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. ATH currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Filecoin, but longer windows can disagree.