Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means Cosmos Hub and 1INCH are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | ATOM | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.25 | $0.081500 |
| Market Cap | $723.29M | $114.45M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.36M | $334,795.44 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 85.00 | 236.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +4.22% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | ATOM | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.21% | +0.37% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | ATOM | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 18.97 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 0.05 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 51.19 | 21.33 |
| Support | — | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1.61 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | — | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for ATOM/1INCH currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | ATOM | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 0.00 | — |
| Github activity | 1,299.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Cosmos Hub
1INCH
Pros and cons
Pros of Cosmos Hub
- Cosmos Hub typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Market-cap scale on Cosmos Hub may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Higher ranking for Cosmos Hub can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of Cosmos Hub
- Crowded positioning around ATOM sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Large-cap status for Cosmos Hub can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of 1INCH
- PEPS tracking for 1INCH still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- 1INCH can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Active volume bursts on 1INCH sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of 1INCH
- Relative underperformance versus Cosmos Hub can persist through entire market regimes.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Trend failures on 1INCH often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for Cosmos Hub on size and Cosmos Hub on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: Cosmos Hub (ATOM) trades near $1.25 with a +1.21% day move, while 1INCH (1INCH) is around $0.081500 (+0.37%). Volume leadership currently sits with Cosmos Hub, and market-cap leadership with Cosmos Hub. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 18.97/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, Cosmos Hub or 1INCH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Cosmos Hub leads on market cap today, while Cosmos Hub leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, ATOM or 1INCH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Cosmos Hub and 1INCH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Cosmos Hub currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Cosmos Hub, but longer windows can disagree.