Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means ULTIMA and CHEEMS are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | ULTIMA | CHEEMS |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,867.53 | $1,867.53 |
| Market Cap | $210.10M | $99.69M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $2.56M | $254,279.00 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 156.00 | 257.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | ULTIMA | CHEEMS |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.60% | +1.80% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | ULTIMA | CHEEMS |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across ULTIMA and CHEEMS, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | ULTIMA | CHEEMS |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
ULTIMA
CHEEMS
Pros and cons
Pros of ULTIMA
- Higher ranking for ULTIMA can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Composite PEPS readings for ULTIMA can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Market-cap scale on ULTIMA may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of ULTIMA
- When dominance narratives fade, ULTIMA can lag hotter rotation names.
- Large-cap status for ULTIMA can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit ULTIMA harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of CHEEMS
- Active volume bursts on CHEEMS sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- PEPS tracking for CHEEMS still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Narrative optionality around CHEEMS can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of CHEEMS
- Trend failures on CHEEMS often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for CHEEMS.
- Relative underperformance versus ULTIMA can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. ULTIMA and CHEEMS can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put ULTIMA at $1,867.53 and CHEEMS at $1,867.53. Relative performance over 24h (CHEEMS) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, ULTIMA or CHEEMS?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. ULTIMA leads on market cap today, while CHEEMS leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, ULTIMA or CHEEMS?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both ULTIMA and CHEEMS.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. ULTIMA currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is CHEEMS, but longer windows can disagree.