Overview
Whether you arrived from a “Chainlink vs OHM” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | LINK | OHM |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $8.29 | $1,853.59 |
| Market Cap | $6.30B | $277.54M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $11.34M | $102,638.00 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 19.00 | 128.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +4.13% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | LINK | OHM |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +2.17% | -0.20% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | LINK | OHM |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 45.39 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 0.33 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 14.96 | 21.33 |
| Support | 8.20 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 8.73 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | neutral | bearish |
| Momentum | — | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for LINK/OHM currently lean on separate regimes: neutral versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | LINK | OHM |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 87.00 | — |
| Github activity | 5,703.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Chainlink
OHM
Pros and cons
Pros of Chainlink
- Composite PEPS readings for Chainlink can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Higher ranking for Chainlink can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Chainlink typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of Chainlink
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Chainlink harder simply because it is more visible.
- When dominance narratives fade, Chainlink can lag hotter rotation names.
- Crowded positioning around LINK sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Large-cap status for Chainlink can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of OHM
- Narrative optionality around OHM can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Diversifying versus Chainlink with OHM can change portfolio factor exposure.
- If technical momentum aligns, OHM may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Active volume bursts on OHM sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of OHM
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for OHM.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave OHM more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Higher volatility on OHM cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Trend failures on OHM often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for Chainlink on size and Chainlink on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
Comparing LINK and OHM begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $8.29 versus $1,853.59. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate OHM-vs-LINK pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, Chainlink or OHM?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Chainlink leads on market cap today, while Chainlink leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, LINK or OHM?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Chainlink and OHM.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Chainlink currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Chainlink, but longer windows can disagree.