Overview
This page compares Chainlink and BEAT with live PEPS metrics. Rankings (#19 vs #59) and liquidity profiles differ, so traders often use them for distinct roles rather than as perfect substitutes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | LINK | BEAT |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $8.26 | $1,856.75 |
| Market Cap | $6.30B | $1.19B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $11.35M | $52.70M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 19.00 | 59.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +4.13% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | LINK | BEAT |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +2.02% | -20.10% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | LINK | BEAT |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 45.39 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 0.33 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 14.96 | 21.33 |
| Support | 8.20 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 8.73 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | neutral | bearish |
| Momentum | — | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across Chainlink and BEAT, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | LINK | BEAT |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 87.00 | — |
| Github activity | 5,703.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Chainlink
BEAT
Pros and cons
Pros of Chainlink
- Market-cap scale on Chainlink may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Chainlink typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Chainlink has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- LINK often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of Chainlink
- Crowded positioning around LINK sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Indicator stacks on Chainlink may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- When dominance narratives fade, Chainlink can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of BEAT
- BEAT can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- If technical momentum aligns, BEAT may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Diversifying versus Chainlink with BEAT can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of BEAT
- Higher volatility on BEAT cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Relative underperformance versus Chainlink can persist through entire market regimes.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for BEAT.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. Chainlink and BEAT can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put Chainlink at $8.26 and BEAT at $1,856.75. Relative performance over 24h (Chainlink) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, Chainlink or BEAT?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Chainlink leads on market cap today, while Chainlink leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, LINK or BEAT?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Chainlink and BEAT.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. BEAT currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Chainlink, but longer windows can disagree.