Overview
Investors searching LINK vs 1INCH usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. Chainlink prints $8.29 (+2.36%) while 1INCH is at $0.081400 (+0.87%), with volume edge currently on Chainlink.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | LINK | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $8.29 | $0.081400 |
| Market Cap | $6.30B | $114.26M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $11.40M | $323,022.75 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 19.00 | 236.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +4.13% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | LINK | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +2.36% | +0.87% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | LINK | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 45.39 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 0.33 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 14.96 | 21.33 |
| Support | 8.20 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 8.73 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | neutral | bearish |
| Momentum | — | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, Chainlink shows RSI 45.39 with trend bias neutral, while 1INCH sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | LINK | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 87.00 | — |
| Github activity | 5,703.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Chainlink
1INCH
Pros and cons
Pros of Chainlink
- Market-cap scale on Chainlink may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Higher ranking for Chainlink can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Chainlink typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of Chainlink
- Crowded positioning around LINK sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Indicator stacks on Chainlink may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- When dominance narratives fade, Chainlink can lag hotter rotation names.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of 1INCH
- If technical momentum aligns, 1INCH may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Narrative optionality around 1INCH can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- PEPS tracking for 1INCH still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of 1INCH
- Relative underperformance versus Chainlink can persist through entire market regimes.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave 1INCH more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to Chainlink, while short-term performance leans toward Chainlink. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
Comparing LINK and 1INCH begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $8.29 versus $0.081400. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate 1INCH-vs-LINK pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, Chainlink or 1INCH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Chainlink leads on market cap today, while Chainlink leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, LINK or 1INCH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Chainlink and 1INCH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Chainlink currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Chainlink, but longer windows can disagree.