Overview
This page compares STX and ULTIMA with live PEPS metrics. Rankings (#134 vs #157) and liquidity profiles differ, so traders often use them for distinct roles rather than as perfect substitutes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | STX | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.139400 | $1,882.65 |
| Market Cap | $258.59M | $207.27M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $399,633.64 | $2.92M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 134.00 | 157.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | STX | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.14% | +3.10% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | STX | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across STX and ULTIMA, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | STX | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
STX
ULTIMA
Pros and cons
Pros of STX
- Higher ranking for STX can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Composite PEPS readings for STX can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- STX often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of STX
- Large-cap status for STX can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit STX harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of ULTIMA
- Diversifying versus STX with ULTIMA can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Active volume bursts on ULTIMA sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- PEPS tracking for ULTIMA still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of ULTIMA
- Trend failures on ULTIMA often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave ULTIMA more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Higher volatility on ULTIMA cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for ULTIMA.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. STX and ULTIMA can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: STX (STX) trades near $0.139400 with a +0.14% day move, while ULTIMA (ULTIMA) is around $1,882.65 (+3.10%). Volume leadership currently sits with ULTIMA, and market-cap leadership with STX. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 54.31/54.31. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, STX or ULTIMA?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. STX leads on market cap today, while ULTIMA leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, STX or ULTIMA?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both STX and ULTIMA.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. ULTIMA currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is ULTIMA, but longer windows can disagree.