Overview
Whether you arrived from a “JUP vs STX” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | JUP | STX |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.196700 | $0.140200 |
| Market Cap | $652.12M | $259.56M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.57M | $411,987.91 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 86.00 | 134.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | JUP | STX |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.76% | +2.34% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | JUP | STX |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across JUP and STX, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | JUP | STX |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
JUP
STX
Pros and cons
Pros of JUP
- Higher ranking for JUP can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Composite PEPS readings for JUP can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Market-cap scale on JUP may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- JUP has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
Cons of JUP
- When dominance narratives fade, JUP can lag hotter rotation names.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit JUP harder simply because it is more visible.
- Crowded positioning around JUP sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of STX
- Diversifying versus JUP with STX can change portfolio factor exposure.
- PEPS tracking for STX still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Narrative optionality around STX can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of STX
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave STX more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for STX.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. JUP and STX can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
Comparing JUP and STX begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $0.196700 versus $0.140200. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate STX-vs-JUP pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, JUP or STX?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. JUP leads on market cap today, while STX leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, JUP or STX?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both JUP and STX.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. JUP currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is STX, but longer windows can disagree.