Overview
From a portfolio lens, BUIDL ($2.70B) and JUP ($638.77M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | BUIDL | JUP |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,855.02 | $0.192700 |
| Market Cap | $2.70B | $638.77M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $0.000000 | $1.35M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 35.00 | 88.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | BUIDL | JUP |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.00% | -2.87% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | BUIDL | JUP |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 64.00 | 64.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, BUIDL shows RSI 54.31 with trend bias bearish, while JUP sits at RSI 54.31 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | BUIDL | JUP |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
BUIDL
JUP
Pros and cons
Pros of BUIDL
- BUIDL has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Higher ranking for BUIDL can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- BUIDL typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Composite PEPS readings for BUIDL can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of BUIDL
- Large-cap status for BUIDL can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Indicator stacks on BUIDL may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit BUIDL harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of JUP
- Active volume bursts on JUP sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Diversifying versus BUIDL with JUP can change portfolio factor exposure.
- If technical momentum aligns, JUP may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Narrative optionality around JUP can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of JUP
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave JUP more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Higher volatility on JUP cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to BUIDL, while short-term performance leans toward BUIDL. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put BUIDL at $1,855.02 and JUP at $0.192700. Relative performance over 24h (BUIDL) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, BUIDL or JUP?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. BUIDL leads on market cap today, while BUIDL leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, BUIDL or JUP?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both BUIDL and JUP.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. JUP currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is BUIDL, but longer windows can disagree.