Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means DCR and Backpack are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | DCR | BP |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $13.22 | $0.380416 |
| Market Cap | $231.62M | $95.10M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $159,724.08 | $1.25M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 146.00 | 263.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | DCR | BP |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.92% | +2.70% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | DCR | BP |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for DCR/BP currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | DCR | BP |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
DCR
Backpack
Pros and cons
Pros of DCR
- DCR typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Composite PEPS readings for DCR can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- DCR often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of DCR
- Indicator stacks on DCR may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Crowded positioning around DCR sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- When dominance narratives fade, DCR can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of Backpack
- If technical momentum aligns, Backpack may outperform on medium-term windows.
- PEPS tracking for Backpack still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Diversifying versus DCR with Backpack can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Backpack can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of Backpack
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Higher volatility on BP cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Backpack more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Relative underperformance versus DCR can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for DCR on size and Backpack on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
Comparing DCR and BP begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $13.22 versus $0.380416. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate BP-vs-DCR pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, DCR or Backpack?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. DCR leads on market cap today, while Backpack leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, DCR or BP?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both DCR and Backpack.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Backpack currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Backpack, but longer windows can disagree.