Overview
Investors searching APE vs ACRED usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. APE prints $0.130900 (+0.08%) while ACRED is at $1,880.40 (-0.10%), with volume edge currently on APE.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | APE | ACRED |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.130900 | $1,880.40 |
| Market Cap | $131.13M | $115.09M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $415,761.47 | $0.000000 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 213.00 | 232.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | APE | ACRED |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.08% | -0.10% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | APE | ACRED |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Automated technical notes for this pair highlight bearish conditions on APE and bearish on ACRED. Volatility differences can amplify short-term gaps.
Fundamentals
| Metric | APE | ACRED |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
APE
ACRED
Pros and cons
Pros of APE
- Market-cap scale on APE may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- APE typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Higher ranking for APE can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of APE
- Crowded positioning around APE sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- When dominance narratives fade, APE can lag hotter rotation names.
- Indicator stacks on APE may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of ACRED
- ACRED can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- PEPS tracking for ACRED still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Diversifying versus APE with ACRED can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of ACRED
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for ACRED.
Which looks stronger right now?
Across winners above, no single coin dominates every column. Prefer scenarios: trend continuation favors the side with aligned momentum; mean-reversion favors the side stretched on RSI.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. APE holds market-cap $131.13M and rank #213; ACRED shows $115.09M and #232. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch APE. Where durability matters, watch APE. AI composite scores (56.80/56.80) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, APE or ACRED?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. APE leads on market cap today, while APE leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, APE or ACRED?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both APE and ACRED.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. APE currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is APE, but longer windows can disagree.