Overview
This page compares RAY and 1INCH with live PEPS metrics. Rankings (#179 vs #239) and liquidity profiles differ, so traders often use them for distinct roles rather than as perfect substitutes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | RAY | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.606500 | $0.081000 |
| Market Cap | $163.42M | $113.92M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $226,513.82 | $326,915.55 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 179.00 | 239.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | RAY | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.13% | +0.12% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | RAY | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across RAY and 1INCH, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | RAY | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
RAY
1INCH
Pros and cons
Pros of RAY
- Market-cap scale on RAY may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Composite PEPS readings for RAY can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- RAY typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of RAY
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit RAY harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of 1INCH
- If technical momentum aligns, 1INCH may outperform on medium-term windows.
- 1INCH can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Diversifying versus RAY with 1INCH can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of 1INCH
- Higher volatility on 1INCH cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for 1INCH.
- Relative underperformance versus RAY can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. RAY and 1INCH can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put RAY at $0.606500 and 1INCH at $0.081000. Relative performance over 24h (RAY) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, RAY or 1INCH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. RAY leads on market cap today, while RAY leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, RAY or 1INCH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both RAY and 1INCH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. 1INCH currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is RAY, but longer windows can disagree.