Overview
Whether you arrived from a “Provenance Blockchain vs THORChain” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | HASH | RUNE |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.008043 | $0.443420 |
| Market Cap | $453.39M | $149.90M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $2,642.11 | $6.41M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 103.00 | 195.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | HASH | RUNE |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -5.70% | +1.00% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | HASH | RUNE |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for HASH/RUNE currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | HASH | RUNE |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Provenance Blockchain
THORChain
Pros and cons
Pros of Provenance Blockchain
- Market-cap scale on Provenance Blockchain may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- HASH often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Provenance Blockchain has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
Cons of Provenance Blockchain
- Crowded positioning around HASH sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Indicator stacks on Provenance Blockchain may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- When dominance narratives fade, Provenance Blockchain can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of THORChain
- THORChain can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Active volume bursts on RUNE sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- PEPS tracking for THORChain still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of THORChain
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Higher volatility on RUNE cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Trend failures on THORChain often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Relative underperformance versus Provenance Blockchain can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for Provenance Blockchain on size and THORChain on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: Provenance Blockchain (HASH) trades near $0.008043 with a -5.70% day move, while THORChain (RUNE) is around $0.443420 (+1.00%). Volume leadership currently sits with THORChain, and market-cap leadership with Provenance Blockchain. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 49.02/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, Provenance Blockchain or THORChain?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Provenance Blockchain leads on market cap today, while THORChain leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, HASH or RUNE?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Provenance Blockchain and THORChain.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. THORChain currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is THORChain, but longer windows can disagree.