Overview
This page compares BNB and Provenance Blockchain with live PEPS metrics. Rankings (#4 vs #105) and liquidity profiles differ, so traders often use them for distinct roles rather than as perfect substitutes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | BNB | HASH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $588.28 | $0.007891 |
| Market Cap | $78.34B | $442.02M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $516.08M | $1,940.52 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 4.00 | 105.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +2.42% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | BNB | HASH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +2.10% | -7.70% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | BNB | HASH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 50.36 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 13.94 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.41 | 21.33 |
| Support | 575.45 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 608.04 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | — | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across BNB and Provenance Blockchain, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | BNB | HASH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 0.00 | — |
| Github activity | 4,252.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
BNB
Provenance Blockchain
Pros and cons
Pros of BNB
- Composite PEPS readings for BNB can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- BNB has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- BNB typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of BNB
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit BNB harder simply because it is more visible.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of Provenance Blockchain
- Diversifying versus BNB with Provenance Blockchain can change portfolio factor exposure.
- If technical momentum aligns, Provenance Blockchain may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Narrative optionality around Provenance Blockchain can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of Provenance Blockchain
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for Provenance Blockchain.
- Higher volatility on HASH cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Provenance Blockchain more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. BNB and Provenance Blockchain can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. BNB holds market-cap $78.34B and rank #4; Provenance Blockchain shows $442.02M and #105. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch BNB. Where durability matters, watch BNB. AI composite scores (43.30/57.90) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, BNB or Provenance Blockchain?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. BNB leads on market cap today, while BNB leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, BNB or HASH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both BNB and Provenance Blockchain.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. BNB currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is BNB, but longer windows can disagree.