Overview
Investors searching HASH vs NEO usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. HASH prints $1,861.70 (-5.70%) while NEO is at $1.82 (-0.20%), with volume edge currently on NEO.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | HASH | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,861.70 | $1.82 |
| Market Cap | $453.39M | $128.55M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $2,642.11 | $2.55M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 103.00 | 215.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | HASH | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -5.70% | -0.20% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | HASH | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Relative technical health favors reading both charts side by side. AI scores (57.80 vs 57.90) summarize PEPS modules, but supports and resistances still decide invalidation.
Fundamentals
| Metric | HASH | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
HASH
NEO
Pros and cons
Pros of HASH
- Higher ranking for HASH can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- HASH has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- HASH typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Composite PEPS readings for HASH can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of HASH
- When dominance narratives fade, HASH can lag hotter rotation names.
- Large-cap status for HASH can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Indicator stacks on HASH may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit HASH harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of NEO
- Active volume bursts on NEO sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Narrative optionality around NEO can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- PEPS tracking for NEO still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of NEO
- Trend failures on NEO often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for NEO.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
If you weight capitalization and liquidity, HASH looks sturdier; if you weight 24h tape, NEO is ahead. A balanced view treats both as incomplete signals.
AI summary
For readers asking which is “better”, the honest answer is conditional. HASH and NEO solve overlapping but not identical market jobs. On-chain and developer fields, when available, add slower-moving context beneath the tape. Missing fundamentals should be treated as unknown, not as zeros. If your thesis is long-term adoption, weight fundamentals and liquidity; if tactical, weight trend/momentum — and always define invalidation.
FAQ
Which is better, HASH or NEO?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. HASH leads on market cap today, while NEO leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, HASH or NEO?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both HASH and NEO.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. NEO currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is NEO, but longer windows can disagree.