Overview
Investors searching HASH vs ATH usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. HASH prints $1,865.83 (-5.60%) while ATH is at $1,865.83 (-1.90%), with volume edge currently on ATH.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | HASH | ATH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,865.83 | $1,865.83 |
| Market Cap | $410.79M | $76.78M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1,674.31 | $5.07M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 106.00 | 299.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | HASH | ATH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -5.60% | -1.90% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | HASH | ATH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 60.00 | 60.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, HASH shows RSI 54.31 with trend bias bearish, while ATH sits at RSI 54.31 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | HASH | ATH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
HASH
ATH
Pros and cons
Pros of HASH
- Higher ranking for HASH can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- HASH typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- HASH has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
Cons of HASH
- Large-cap status for HASH can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- When dominance narratives fade, HASH can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of ATH
- Diversifying versus HASH with ATH can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Active volume bursts on ATH sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- PEPS tracking for ATH still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of ATH
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave ATH more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for ATH.
- Higher volatility on ATH cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Trend failures on ATH often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to HASH, while short-term performance leans toward ATH. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. HASH holds market-cap $410.79M and rank #106; ATH shows $76.78M and #299. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch ATH. Where durability matters, watch HASH. AI composite scores (58.20/58.20) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, HASH or ATH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. HASH leads on market cap today, while ATH leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, HASH or ATH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both HASH and ATH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. ATH currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is ATH, but longer windows can disagree.