Overview
HASH vs 1INCH is one of the most watched crypto matchups. Beyond headline prices, this comparison blends market structure, technical readings and probabilistic context without promising outcomes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | HASH | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,861.70 | $0.081400 |
| Market Cap | $453.39M | $114.26M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $2,642.11 | $323,022.75 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 103.00 | 236.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | HASH | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -5.70% | +0.87% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | HASH | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for HASH/1INCH currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | HASH | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
HASH
1INCH
Pros and cons
Pros of HASH
- Higher ranking for HASH can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- HASH often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- HASH has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
Cons of HASH
- When dominance narratives fade, HASH can lag hotter rotation names.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit HASH harder simply because it is more visible.
- Crowded positioning around HASH sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of 1INCH
- Narrative optionality around 1INCH can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Diversifying versus HASH with 1INCH can change portfolio factor exposure.
- PEPS tracking for 1INCH still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of 1INCH
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave 1INCH more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for 1INCH.
- Relative underperformance versus HASH can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for HASH on size and 1INCH on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
Comparing HASH and 1INCH begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $1,861.70 versus $0.081400. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate 1INCH-vs-HASH pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, HASH or 1INCH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. HASH leads on market cap today, while 1INCH leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, HASH or 1INCH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both HASH and 1INCH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. 1INCH currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is 1INCH, but longer windows can disagree.