Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means Sei and ZAMA are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | SEI | ZAMA |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.041350 | $0.051400 |
| Market Cap | $301.91M | $112.28M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $798,340.37 | $7.56M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 129.00 | 242.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | SEI | ZAMA |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.17% | -3.29% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | SEI | ZAMA |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for SEI/ZAMA currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | SEI | ZAMA |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 0.00 | — |
| Github activity | 0.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Sei
ZAMA
Pros and cons
Pros of Sei
- Higher ranking for Sei can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Composite PEPS readings for Sei can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Sei typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Sei has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
Cons of Sei
- Large-cap status for Sei can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Sei harder simply because it is more visible.
- Crowded positioning around SEI sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of ZAMA
- Active volume bursts on ZAMA sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Narrative optionality around ZAMA can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- ZAMA can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of ZAMA
- Trend failures on ZAMA often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Higher volatility on ZAMA cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave ZAMA more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for Sei on size and ZAMA on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: Sei (SEI) trades near $0.041350 with a +1.17% day move, while ZAMA (ZAMA) is around $0.051400 (-3.29%). Volume leadership currently sits with ZAMA, and market-cap leadership with Sei. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 49.02/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, Sei or ZAMA?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Sei leads on market cap today, while Sei leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, SEI or ZAMA?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Sei and ZAMA.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. ZAMA currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Sei, but longer windows can disagree.