Overview
Investors searching WLD vs STRK usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. WLD prints $0.313300 (+2.42%) while STRK is at $0.024520 (-2.93%), with volume edge currently on WLD.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | WLD | STRK |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.313300 | $0.024520 |
| Market Cap | $1.11B | $166.88M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $9.74M | $1.31M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 62.00 | 177.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | WLD | STRK |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +2.42% | -2.93% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | WLD | STRK |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Relative technical health favors reading both charts side by side. AI scores (57.90 vs 57.90) summarize PEPS modules, but supports and resistances still decide invalidation.
Fundamentals
| Metric | WLD | STRK |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
WLD
STRK
Pros and cons
Pros of WLD
- Composite PEPS readings for WLD can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- WLD has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- WLD often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of WLD
- When dominance narratives fade, WLD can lag hotter rotation names.
- Crowded positioning around WLD sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit WLD harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of STRK
- Narrative optionality around STRK can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- STRK can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of STRK
- Trend failures on STRK often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Higher volatility on STRK cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
If you weight capitalization and liquidity, WLD looks sturdier; if you weight 24h tape, WLD is ahead. A balanced view treats both as incomplete signals.
AI summary
Comparing WLD and STRK begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $0.313300 versus $0.024520. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate STRK-vs-WLD pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, WLD or STRK?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. WLD leads on market cap today, while WLD leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, WLD or STRK?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both WLD and STRK.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. WLD currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is WLD, but longer windows can disagree.