Overview
WLD and FIL rarely move in perfect sync. Today’s print ($0.314300/$0.720200) and 24h leaders (WLD) help frame which side currently carries relative strength.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | WLD | FIL |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.314300 | $0.720200 |
| Market Cap | $1.12B | $562.65M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $10.11M | $4.05M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 61.00 | 91.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +5.67% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | WLD | FIL |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +3.83% | +2.89% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | WLD | FIL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 42.21 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 0.04 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 24.60 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 0.67 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 0.82 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | — |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, WLD shows RSI 49.02 with trend bias bearish, while Filecoin sits at RSI 42.21 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | WLD | FIL |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | 0.00 |
| Github activity | — | 0.00 |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
WLD
Filecoin
Pros and cons
Pros of WLD
- WLD has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- WLD typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of WLD
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit WLD harder simply because it is more visible.
- Large-cap status for WLD can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of Filecoin
- Active volume bursts on FIL sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Diversifying versus WLD with Filecoin can change portfolio factor exposure.
- If technical momentum aligns, Filecoin may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of Filecoin
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for Filecoin.
- Trend failures on Filecoin often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Relative underperformance versus WLD can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to WLD, while short-term performance leans toward WLD. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. WLD holds market-cap $1.12B and rank #61; Filecoin shows $562.65M and #91. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch WLD. Where durability matters, watch WLD. AI composite scores (57.90/45.40) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, WLD or Filecoin?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. WLD leads on market cap today, while WLD leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, WLD or FIL?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both WLD and Filecoin.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. WLD currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is WLD, but longer windows can disagree.