Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means Raydium and UnifAI Network are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | RAY | UAI |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.609665 | $0.508285 |
| Market Cap | $164.21M | $121.47M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $7.26M | $9.92M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 179.00 | 226.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | RAY | UAI |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +2.10% | +0.90% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | RAY | UAI |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Use the indicator table as a checklist: if momentum and trend align on one asset while the other diverges, relative-value setups become more interesting — still without certainty.
Fundamentals
| Metric | RAY | UAI |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Raydium
UnifAI Network
Pros and cons
Pros of Raydium
- Composite PEPS readings for Raydium can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Market-cap scale on Raydium may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Higher ranking for Raydium can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of Raydium
- Large-cap status for Raydium can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Raydium harder simply because it is more visible.
- Indicator stacks on Raydium may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of UnifAI Network
- Diversifying versus Raydium with UnifAI Network can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Active volume bursts on UAI sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- If technical momentum aligns, UnifAI Network may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Narrative optionality around UnifAI Network can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of UnifAI Network
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave UnifAI Network more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Trend failures on UnifAI Network often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
Statistically, higher market cap (Raydium) often correlates with deeper books, while hotter 24h prints (Raydium) can fade. Position sizing should reflect that uncertainty.
AI summary
For readers asking which is “better”, the honest answer is conditional. Raydium and UnifAI Network solve overlapping but not identical market jobs. On-chain and developer fields, when available, add slower-moving context beneath the tape. Missing fundamentals should be treated as unknown, not as zeros. If your thesis is long-term adoption, weight fundamentals and liquidity; if tactical, weight trend/momentum — and always define invalidation.
FAQ
Which is better, Raydium or UnifAI Network?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Raydium leads on market cap today, while Raydium leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, RAY or UAI?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Raydium and UnifAI Network.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. UnifAI Network currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Raydium, but longer windows can disagree.