Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means ULTIMA and SAND are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | ULTIMA | SAND |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,853.59 | $0.043620 |
| Market Cap | $210.19M | $129.81M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $2.48M | $467,578.81 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 154.00 | 232.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | ULTIMA | SAND |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +2.10% | +3.86% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | ULTIMA | SAND |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for ULTIMA/SAND currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | ULTIMA | SAND |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
ULTIMA
SAND
Pros and cons
Pros of ULTIMA
- ULTIMA has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- ULTIMA often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Higher ranking for ULTIMA can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of ULTIMA
- Large-cap status for ULTIMA can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- When dominance narratives fade, ULTIMA can lag hotter rotation names.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of SAND
- Active volume bursts on SAND sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Narrative optionality around SAND can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- If technical momentum aligns, SAND may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of SAND
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave SAND more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Trend failures on SAND often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Higher volatility on SAND cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for SAND.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for ULTIMA on size and ULTIMA on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
For readers asking which is “better”, the honest answer is conditional. ULTIMA and SAND solve overlapping but not identical market jobs. On-chain and developer fields, when available, add slower-moving context beneath the tape. Missing fundamentals should be treated as unknown, not as zeros. If your thesis is long-term adoption, weight fundamentals and liquidity; if tactical, weight trend/momentum — and always define invalidation.
FAQ
Which is better, ULTIMA or SAND?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. ULTIMA leads on market cap today, while SAND leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, ULTIMA or SAND?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both ULTIMA and SAND.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. ULTIMA currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is SAND, but longer windows can disagree.