Overview
Immutable (IMX) and Ultima (ULTIMA) sit at different layers of the crypto stack. At current prices ($0.111921 vs $2,459.57), market leadership still favors Immutable on capitalization, while 24h tape is led by Immutable.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | IMX | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.111921 | $2,459.57 |
| Market Cap | $223.85M | $208.29M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $6.59M | $2.67M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 264.00 | 157.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | IMX | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +3.70% | +2.70% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | IMX | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, Immutable shows RSI 49.02 with trend bias bearish, while Ultima sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | IMX | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Immutable
Ultima
Pros and cons
Pros of Immutable
- Immutable has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Composite PEPS readings for Immutable can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Immutable typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of Immutable
- Large-cap status for Immutable can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- When dominance narratives fade, Immutable can lag hotter rotation names.
- Indicator stacks on Immutable may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Immutable harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of Ultima
- Narrative optionality around Ultima can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Diversifying versus Immutable with Ultima can change portfolio factor exposure.
- PEPS tracking for Ultima still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of Ultima
- Trend failures on Ultima often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Relative underperformance versus Immutable can persist through entire market regimes.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Ultima more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to Immutable, while short-term performance leans toward Immutable. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: Immutable (IMX) trades near $0.111921 with a +3.70% day move, while Ultima (ULTIMA) is around $2,459.57 (+2.70%). Volume leadership currently sits with Immutable, and market-cap leadership with Immutable. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 49.02/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, Immutable or Ultima?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Immutable leads on market cap today, while Immutable leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, IMX or ULTIMA?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Immutable and Ultima.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Immutable currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Immutable, but longer windows can disagree.