Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means ULTIMA and FGRS are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | ULTIMA | FGRS |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,871.67 | $1,871.67 |
| Market Cap | $208.04M | $170.00M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $3.16M | $24.60 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 156.00 | 176.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | ULTIMA | FGRS |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +3.80% | -1.50% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | ULTIMA | FGRS |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for ULTIMA/FGRS currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | ULTIMA | FGRS |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
ULTIMA
FGRS
Pros and cons
Pros of ULTIMA
- Composite PEPS readings for ULTIMA can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- ULTIMA has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- ULTIMA often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of ULTIMA
- Large-cap status for ULTIMA can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- When dominance narratives fade, ULTIMA can lag hotter rotation names.
- Crowded positioning around ULTIMA sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of FGRS
- Active volume bursts on FGRS sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- If technical momentum aligns, FGRS may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Diversifying versus ULTIMA with FGRS can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of FGRS
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave FGRS more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for FGRS.
- Relative underperformance versus ULTIMA can persist through entire market regimes.
- Trend failures on FGRS often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for ULTIMA on size and ULTIMA on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: ULTIMA (ULTIMA) trades near $1,871.67 with a +3.80% day move, while FGRS (FGRS) is around $1,871.67 (-1.50%). Volume leadership currently sits with ULTIMA, and market-cap leadership with ULTIMA. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 54.31/54.31. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, ULTIMA or FGRS?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. ULTIMA leads on market cap today, while ULTIMA leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, ULTIMA or FGRS?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both ULTIMA and FGRS.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. ULTIMA currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is ULTIMA, but longer windows can disagree.