Overview
RUNE vs 1INCH is one of the most watched crypto matchups. Beyond headline prices, this comparison blends market structure, technical readings and probabilistic context without promising outcomes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | RUNE | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.442000 | $0.081500 |
| Market Cap | $149.66M | $114.45M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $753,692.45 | $334,795.44 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 197.00 | 236.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | RUNE | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.23% | +0.37% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | RUNE | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across RUNE and 1INCH, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | RUNE | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
RUNE
1INCH
Pros and cons
Pros of RUNE
- RUNE typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Higher ranking for RUNE can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Market-cap scale on RUNE may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of RUNE
- Crowded positioning around RUNE sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Large-cap status for RUNE can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Indicator stacks on RUNE may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of 1INCH
- If technical momentum aligns, 1INCH may outperform on medium-term windows.
- PEPS tracking for 1INCH still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Narrative optionality around 1INCH can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of 1INCH
- Relative underperformance versus RUNE can persist through entire market regimes.
- Higher volatility on 1INCH cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Trend failures on 1INCH often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. RUNE and 1INCH can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. RUNE holds market-cap $149.66M and rank #197; 1INCH shows $114.45M and #236. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch RUNE. Where durability matters, watch RUNE. AI composite scores (57.90/57.90) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, RUNE or 1INCH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. RUNE leads on market cap today, while 1INCH leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, RUNE or 1INCH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both RUNE and 1INCH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. RUNE currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is 1INCH, but longer windows can disagree.