Overview
Investors searching CHZ vs SAND usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. Chiliz prints $0.012920 (+0.40%) while The Sandbox is at $0.043204 (+3.70%), with volume edge currently on Chiliz.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | CHZ | SAND |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.012920 | $0.043204 |
| Market Cap | $135.24M | $129.61M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $13.93M | $8.08M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 209.00 | 233.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | CHZ | SAND |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.40% | +3.70% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | CHZ | SAND |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Relative technical health favors reading both charts side by side. AI scores (57.90 vs 57.90) summarize PEPS modules, but supports and resistances still decide invalidation.
Fundamentals
| Metric | CHZ | SAND |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Chiliz
The Sandbox
Pros and cons
Pros of Chiliz
- Market-cap scale on Chiliz may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Chiliz typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Chiliz has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- CHZ often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of Chiliz
- Indicator stacks on Chiliz may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Crowded positioning around CHZ sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Large-cap status for Chiliz can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of The Sandbox
- If technical momentum aligns, The Sandbox may outperform on medium-term windows.
- The Sandbox can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Diversifying versus Chiliz with The Sandbox can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of The Sandbox
- Higher volatility on SAND cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for The Sandbox.
Which looks stronger right now?
If you weight capitalization and liquidity, Chiliz looks sturdier; if you weight 24h tape, The Sandbox is ahead. A balanced view treats both as incomplete signals.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. Chiliz holds market-cap $135.24M and rank #209; The Sandbox shows $129.61M and #233. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch Chiliz. Where durability matters, watch Chiliz. AI composite scores (57.90/57.90) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, Chiliz or The Sandbox?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Chiliz leads on market cap today, while The Sandbox leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, CHZ or SAND?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Chiliz and The Sandbox.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Chiliz currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is The Sandbox, but longer windows can disagree.