Overview
JUP and GRT rarely move in perfect sync. Today’s print ($0.196700/$0.014640) and 24h leaders (GRT) help frame which side currently carries relative strength.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | JUP | GRT |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.196700 | $0.014640 |
| Market Cap | $652.12M | $158.09M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.57M | $379,983.03 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 86.00 | 188.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | JUP | GRT |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.76% | +3.03% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | JUP | GRT |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, JUP shows RSI 49.02 with trend bias bearish, while GRT sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | JUP | GRT |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
JUP
GRT
Pros and cons
Pros of JUP
- JUP has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Composite PEPS readings for JUP can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- JUP typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of JUP
- When dominance narratives fade, JUP can lag hotter rotation names.
- Large-cap status for JUP can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Crowded positioning around JUP sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of GRT
- Narrative optionality around GRT can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- GRT can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Active volume bursts on GRT sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of GRT
- Trend failures on GRT often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for GRT.
- Higher volatility on GRT cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to JUP, while short-term performance leans toward GRT. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. JUP holds market-cap $652.12M and rank #86; GRT shows $158.09M and #188. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch JUP. Where durability matters, watch JUP. AI composite scores (56.80/56.80) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, JUP or GRT?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. JUP leads on market cap today, while GRT leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, JUP or GRT?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both JUP and GRT.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. JUP currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is GRT, but longer windows can disagree.