Overview
From a portfolio lens, Shuffle ($127.00M) and StandX DUSD ($81.80M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | SHFL | DUSD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.298731 | $0.998630 |
| Market Cap | $127.00M | $81.80M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $509,158.00 | $168,564.00 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 216.00 | 288.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | SHFL | DUSD |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -0.50% | +0.00% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | SHFL | DUSD |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Relative technical health favors reading both charts side by side. AI scores (57.80 vs 57.80) summarize PEPS modules, but supports and resistances still decide invalidation.
Fundamentals
| Metric | SHFL | DUSD |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Shuffle
StandX DUSD
Pros and cons
Pros of Shuffle
- Market-cap scale on Shuffle may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- SHFL often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Shuffle has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
Cons of Shuffle
- Indicator stacks on Shuffle may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Crowded positioning around SHFL sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- When dominance narratives fade, Shuffle can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of StandX DUSD
- StandX DUSD can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- If technical momentum aligns, StandX DUSD may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Active volume bursts on DUSD sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- PEPS tracking for StandX DUSD still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of StandX DUSD
- Higher volatility on DUSD cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Trend failures on StandX DUSD often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Relative underperformance versus Shuffle can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
If you weight capitalization and liquidity, Shuffle looks sturdier; if you weight 24h tape, StandX DUSD is ahead. A balanced view treats both as incomplete signals.
AI summary
Comparing SHFL and DUSD begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $0.298731 versus $0.998630. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate DUSD-vs-SHFL pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, Shuffle or StandX DUSD?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Shuffle leads on market cap today, while StandX DUSD leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, SHFL or DUSD?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Shuffle and StandX DUSD.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Shuffle currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is StandX DUSD, but longer windows can disagree.