Overview
This page compares HASH and Sei with live PEPS metrics. Rankings (#105 vs #129) and liquidity profiles differ, so traders often use them for distinct roles rather than as perfect substitutes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | HASH | SEI |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,874.22 | $0.041350 |
| Market Cap | $442.02M | $301.91M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1,940.52 | $798,340.37 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 105.00 | 129.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | HASH | SEI |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -7.70% | +1.17% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | HASH | SEI |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for HASH/SEI currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | HASH | SEI |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | 0.00 |
| Github activity | — | 0.00 |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
HASH
Sei
Pros and cons
Pros of HASH
- HASH typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Composite PEPS readings for HASH can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- HASH often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of HASH
- Indicator stacks on HASH may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Crowded positioning around HASH sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- When dominance narratives fade, HASH can lag hotter rotation names.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of Sei
- Sei can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Active volume bursts on SEI sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of Sei
- Relative underperformance versus HASH can persist through entire market regimes.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for Sei.
- Higher volatility on SEI cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for HASH on size and Sei on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
Comparing HASH and SEI begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $1,874.22 versus $0.041350. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate SEI-vs-HASH pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, HASH or Sei?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. HASH leads on market cap today, while Sei leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, HASH or SEI?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both HASH and Sei.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Sei currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Sei, but longer windows can disagree.