Overview
FDUSD vs USDAT is one of the most watched crypto matchups. Beyond headline prices, this comparison blends market structure, technical readings and probabilistic context without promising outcomes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | FDUSD | USDAT |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.998300 | $1,887.28 |
| Market Cap | $349.28M | $106.94M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $11.72M | $1.15M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 116.00 | 249.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | FDUSD | USDAT |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.03% | +0.00% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | FDUSD | USDAT |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across FDUSD and USDAT, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | FDUSD | USDAT |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
FDUSD
USDAT
Pros and cons
Pros of FDUSD
- Composite PEPS readings for FDUSD can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Higher ranking for FDUSD can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Market-cap scale on FDUSD may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of FDUSD
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit FDUSD harder simply because it is more visible.
- When dominance narratives fade, FDUSD can lag hotter rotation names.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of USDAT
- Narrative optionality around USDAT can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Diversifying versus FDUSD with USDAT can change portfolio factor exposure.
- PEPS tracking for USDAT still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Active volume bursts on USDAT sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of USDAT
- Trend failures on USDAT often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave USDAT more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Relative underperformance versus FDUSD can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. FDUSD and USDAT can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put FDUSD at $0.998300 and USDAT at $1,887.28. Relative performance over 24h (FDUSD) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, FDUSD or USDAT?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. FDUSD leads on market cap today, while FDUSD leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, FDUSD or USDAT?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both FDUSD and USDAT.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. FDUSD currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is FDUSD, but longer windows can disagree.