Overview
Investors searching USDY vs RAY usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. USDY prints $1,887.28 (+0.10%) while RAY is at $0.615700 (+2.19%), with volume edge currently on USDY.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | USDY | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,887.28 | $0.615700 |
| Market Cap | $2.15B | $165.69M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.92M | $201,019.94 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 40.00 | 179.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | USDY | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.10% | +2.19% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | USDY | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, USDY shows RSI 49.02 with trend bias bearish, while RAY sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | USDY | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
USDY
RAY
Pros and cons
Pros of USDY
- USDY often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- USDY typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Higher ranking for USDY can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Market-cap scale on USDY may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of USDY
- Indicator stacks on USDY may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Crowded positioning around USDY sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Large-cap status for USDY can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of RAY
- RAY can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Narrative optionality around RAY can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- PEPS tracking for RAY still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of RAY
- Relative underperformance versus USDY can persist through entire market regimes.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for RAY.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to USDY, while short-term performance leans toward RAY. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put USDY at $1,887.28 and RAY at $0.615700. Relative performance over 24h (RAY) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, USDY or RAY?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. USDY leads on market cap today, while RAY leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, USDY or RAY?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both USDY and RAY.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. USDY currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is RAY, but longer windows can disagree.