Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means KAIA and RAY are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | KAIA | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.026400 | $0.609600 |
| Market Cap | $168.05M | $164.07M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $354,571.39 | $206,799.09 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 176.00 | 179.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | KAIA | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -0.75% | +1.15% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | KAIA | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for KAIA/RAY currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | KAIA | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
KAIA
RAY
Pros and cons
Pros of KAIA
- Higher ranking for KAIA can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Composite PEPS readings for KAIA can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- KAIA typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- KAIA has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
Cons of KAIA
- When dominance narratives fade, KAIA can lag hotter rotation names.
- Indicator stacks on KAIA may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Large-cap status for KAIA can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of RAY
- Active volume bursts on RAY sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Diversifying versus KAIA with RAY can change portfolio factor exposure.
- RAY can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of RAY
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave RAY more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Higher volatility on RAY cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for KAIA on size and KAIA on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
For readers asking which is “better”, the honest answer is conditional. KAIA and RAY solve overlapping but not identical market jobs. On-chain and developer fields, when available, add slower-moving context beneath the tape. Missing fundamentals should be treated as unknown, not as zeros. If your thesis is long-term adoption, weight fundamentals and liquidity; if tactical, weight trend/momentum — and always define invalidation.
FAQ
Which is better, KAIA or RAY?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. KAIA leads on market cap today, while RAY leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, KAIA or RAY?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both KAIA and RAY.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. KAIA currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is RAY, but longer windows can disagree.