Overview
Whether you arrived from a “HYPE vs RAY” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | HYPE | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,867.53 | $0.609600 |
| Market Cap | $11.64B | $164.07M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $253.44M | $206,799.09 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 10.00 | 179.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | HYPE | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -0.50% | +1.15% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | HYPE | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for HYPE/RAY currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | HYPE | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
HYPE
RAY
Pros and cons
Pros of HYPE
- Composite PEPS readings for HYPE can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- HYPE typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of HYPE
- When dominance narratives fade, HYPE can lag hotter rotation names.
- Large-cap status for HYPE can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Indicator stacks on HYPE may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of RAY
- Narrative optionality around RAY can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Active volume bursts on RAY sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- PEPS tracking for RAY still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Diversifying versus HYPE with RAY can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of RAY
- Trend failures on RAY often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for RAY.
- Relative underperformance versus HYPE can persist through entire market regimes.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave RAY more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for HYPE on size and HYPE on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
Comparing HYPE and RAY begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $1,867.53 versus $0.609600. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate RAY-vs-HYPE pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, HYPE or RAY?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. HYPE leads on market cap today, while RAY leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, HYPE or RAY?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both HYPE and RAY.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. HYPE currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is RAY, but longer windows can disagree.