Overview
From a portfolio lens, RAY ($163.53M) and MANA ($130.44M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | RAY | MANA |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.608000 | $0.067100 |
| Market Cap | $163.53M | $130.44M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $229,249.27 | $234,986.88 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 179.00 | 214.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | RAY | MANA |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -0.08% | +1.51% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | RAY | MANA |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Automated technical notes for this pair highlight bearish conditions on RAY and bearish on MANA. Volatility differences can amplify short-term gaps.
Fundamentals
| Metric | RAY | MANA |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
RAY
MANA
Pros and cons
Pros of RAY
- Market-cap scale on RAY may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- RAY typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- RAY has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
Cons of RAY
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- When dominance narratives fade, RAY can lag hotter rotation names.
- Indicator stacks on RAY may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of MANA
- PEPS tracking for MANA still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- If technical momentum aligns, MANA may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Narrative optionality around MANA can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of MANA
- Relative underperformance versus RAY can persist through entire market regimes.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Trend failures on MANA often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
Across winners above, no single coin dominates every column. Prefer scenarios: trend continuation favors the side with aligned momentum; mean-reversion favors the side stretched on RSI.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. RAY holds market-cap $163.53M and rank #179; MANA shows $130.44M and #214. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch MANA. Where durability matters, watch RAY. AI composite scores (57.90/57.90) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, RAY or MANA?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. RAY leads on market cap today, while MANA leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, RAY or MANA?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both RAY and MANA.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. MANA currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is MANA, but longer windows can disagree.