Overview
Investors searching QNT vs POL usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. QNT prints $60.35 (-2.19%) while POL (ex-MATIC) is at $0.073050 (+0.23%), with volume edge currently on POL (ex-MATIC).
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | QNT | POL |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $60.35 | $0.073050 |
| Market Cap | $875.64M | $826.65M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $756,741.89 | $1.23M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 72.00 | 78.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.66% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | QNT | POL |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -2.19% | +0.23% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | QNT | POL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 35.61 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 0.00 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 24.06 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 0.07 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 0.08 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | — |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Relative technical health favors reading both charts side by side. AI scores (57.90 vs 46.70) summarize PEPS modules, but supports and resistances still decide invalidation.
Fundamentals
| Metric | QNT | POL |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | 0.00 |
| Github activity | — | 0.00 |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
QNT
POL (ex-MATIC)
Pros and cons
Pros of QNT
- QNT has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Higher ranking for QNT can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Market-cap scale on QNT may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Composite PEPS readings for QNT can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of QNT
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit QNT harder simply because it is more visible.
- Large-cap status for QNT can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Crowded positioning around QNT sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of POL (ex-MATIC)
- Narrative optionality around POL (ex-MATIC) can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Diversifying versus QNT with POL (ex-MATIC) can change portfolio factor exposure.
- PEPS tracking for POL (ex-MATIC) still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of POL (ex-MATIC)
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for POL (ex-MATIC).
- Higher volatility on POL cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave POL (ex-MATIC) more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
If you weight capitalization and liquidity, QNT looks sturdier; if you weight 24h tape, POL (ex-MATIC) is ahead. A balanced view treats both as incomplete signals.
AI summary
Comparing QNT and POL begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $60.35 versus $0.073050. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate POL-vs-QNT pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, QNT or POL (ex-MATIC)?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. QNT leads on market cap today, while POL (ex-MATIC) leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, QNT or POL?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both QNT and POL (ex-MATIC).
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. POL (ex-MATIC) currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is POL (ex-MATIC), but longer windows can disagree.