Overview
Whether you arrived from a “QNT vs FDUSD” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | QNT | FDUSD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $60.74 | $0.998000 |
| Market Cap | $883.34M | $349.17M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $529,183.76 | $12.12M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 72.00 | 116.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | QNT | FDUSD |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -1.75% | +0.00% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | QNT | FDUSD |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across QNT and FDUSD, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | QNT | FDUSD |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
QNT
FDUSD
Pros and cons
Pros of QNT
- Market-cap scale on QNT may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- QNT typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- QNT has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- QNT often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of QNT
- Crowded positioning around QNT sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Indicator stacks on QNT may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Large-cap status for QNT can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of FDUSD
- PEPS tracking for FDUSD still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- FDUSD can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Active volume bursts on FDUSD sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of FDUSD
- Higher volatility on FDUSD cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Relative underperformance versus QNT can persist through entire market regimes.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for FDUSD.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. QNT and FDUSD can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. QNT holds market-cap $883.34M and rank #72; FDUSD shows $349.17M and #116. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch FDUSD. Where durability matters, watch QNT. AI composite scores (57.90/57.90) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, QNT or FDUSD?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. QNT leads on market cap today, while FDUSD leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, QNT or FDUSD?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both QNT and FDUSD.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. FDUSD currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is FDUSD, but longer windows can disagree.