Overview
QNT (QNT) and 1INCH (1INCH) sit at different layers of the crypto stack. At current prices ($60.74 vs $0.081500), market leadership still favors QNT on capitalization, while 24h tape is led by 1INCH.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | QNT | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $60.74 | $0.081500 |
| Market Cap | $883.34M | $114.45M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $529,183.76 | $334,795.44 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 72.00 | 236.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | QNT | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -1.75% | +0.37% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | QNT | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, QNT shows RSI 49.02 with trend bias bearish, while 1INCH sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | QNT | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
QNT
1INCH
Pros and cons
Pros of QNT
- Composite PEPS readings for QNT can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- QNT typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Higher ranking for QNT can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of QNT
- Large-cap status for QNT can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit QNT harder simply because it is more visible.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of 1INCH
- Narrative optionality around 1INCH can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Active volume bursts on 1INCH sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- PEPS tracking for 1INCH still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of 1INCH
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for 1INCH.
- Trend failures on 1INCH often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Higher volatility on 1INCH cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to QNT, while short-term performance leans toward 1INCH. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put QNT at $60.74 and 1INCH at $0.081500. Relative performance over 24h (1INCH) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, QNT or 1INCH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. QNT leads on market cap today, while 1INCH leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, QNT or 1INCH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both QNT and 1INCH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. QNT currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is 1INCH, but longer windows can disagree.