Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means Pump.fun and ACRED are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | PUMP | ACRED |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.002122 | $1,882.43 |
| Market Cap | $839.90M | $115.14M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $73.35M | $0.000000 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 76.00 | 233.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | PUMP | ACRED |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.20% | +0.00% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | PUMP | ACRED |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Use the indicator table as a checklist: if momentum and trend align on one asset while the other diverges, relative-value setups become more interesting — still without certainty.
Fundamentals
| Metric | PUMP | ACRED |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Pump.fun
ACRED
Pros and cons
Pros of Pump.fun
- Pump.fun has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Composite PEPS readings for Pump.fun can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- PUMP often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of Pump.fun
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Pump.fun harder simply because it is more visible.
- When dominance narratives fade, Pump.fun can lag hotter rotation names.
- Indicator stacks on Pump.fun may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of ACRED
- Narrative optionality around ACRED can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Active volume bursts on ACRED sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- ACRED can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of ACRED
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for ACRED.
- Higher volatility on ACRED cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Trend failures on ACRED often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
Statistically, higher market cap (Pump.fun) often correlates with deeper books, while hotter 24h prints (Pump.fun) can fade. Position sizing should reflect that uncertainty.
AI summary
Comparing PUMP and ACRED begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $0.002122 versus $1,882.43. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate ACRED-vs-PUMP pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, Pump.fun or ACRED?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Pump.fun leads on market cap today, while Pump.fun leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, PUMP or ACRED?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Pump.fun and ACRED.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Pump.fun currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Pump.fun, but longer windows can disagree.