Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means Pudgy Penguins and Backpack are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | PENGU | BP |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.006185 | $0.369181 |
| Market Cap | $388.83M | $92.30M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $57.12M | $1.20M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 110.00 | 268.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | PENGU | BP |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +4.40% | -3.70% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | PENGU | BP |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across Pudgy Penguins and Backpack, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | PENGU | BP |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Pudgy Penguins
Backpack
Pros and cons
Pros of Pudgy Penguins
- Market-cap scale on Pudgy Penguins may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Higher ranking for Pudgy Penguins can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Pudgy Penguins typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of Pudgy Penguins
- Indicator stacks on Pudgy Penguins may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- When dominance narratives fade, Pudgy Penguins can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of Backpack
- Backpack can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- PEPS tracking for Backpack still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Active volume bursts on BP sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of Backpack
- Higher volatility on BP cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Relative underperformance versus Pudgy Penguins can persist through entire market regimes.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Backpack more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. Pudgy Penguins and Backpack can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. Pudgy Penguins holds market-cap $388.83M and rank #110; Backpack shows $92.30M and #268. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch Pudgy Penguins. Where durability matters, watch Pudgy Penguins. AI composite scores (57.90/57.90) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, Pudgy Penguins or Backpack?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Pudgy Penguins leads on market cap today, while Pudgy Penguins leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, PENGU or BP?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Pudgy Penguins and Backpack.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Pudgy Penguins currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Pudgy Penguins, but longer windows can disagree.