Overview
Pendle (PENDLE) and Maple Finance (SYRUP) sit at different layers of the crypto stack. At current prices ($1.38 vs $0.155270), market leadership still favors Pendle on capitalization, while 24h tape is led by Pendle.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | PENDLE | SYRUP |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.38 | $0.155270 |
| Market Cap | $237.70M | $193.28M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $17.81M | $2.94M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 145.00 | 171.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | PENDLE | SYRUP |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.50% | -0.50% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | PENDLE | SYRUP |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Relative technical health favors reading both charts side by side. AI scores (58.40 vs 58.40) summarize PEPS modules, but supports and resistances still decide invalidation.
Fundamentals
| Metric | PENDLE | SYRUP |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Pendle
Maple Finance
Pros and cons
Pros of Pendle
- Composite PEPS readings for Pendle can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Pendle has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Pendle typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Higher ranking for Pendle can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of Pendle
- Large-cap status for Pendle can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- When dominance narratives fade, Pendle can lag hotter rotation names.
- Crowded positioning around PENDLE sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of Maple Finance
- Active volume bursts on SYRUP sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Diversifying versus Pendle with Maple Finance can change portfolio factor exposure.
- PEPS tracking for Maple Finance still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of Maple Finance
- Trend failures on Maple Finance often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Maple Finance more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Higher volatility on SYRUP cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
If you weight capitalization and liquidity, Pendle looks sturdier; if you weight 24h tape, Pendle is ahead. A balanced view treats both as incomplete signals.
AI summary
Comparing PENDLE and SYRUP begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $1.38 versus $0.155270. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate SYRUP-vs-PENDLE pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, Pendle or Maple Finance?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Pendle leads on market cap today, while Pendle leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, PENDLE or SYRUP?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Pendle and Maple Finance.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Pendle currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Pendle, but longer windows can disagree.