Overview
Investors searching WLD vs OP usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. WLD prints $0.313300 (+3.95%) while Optimism is at $0.086000 (+3.37%), with volume edge currently on WLD.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | WLD | OP |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.313300 | $0.086000 |
| Market Cap | $1.12B | $216.56M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $9.86M | $1.40M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 61.00 | 163.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +6.00% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | WLD | OP |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +3.95% | +3.37% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | WLD | OP |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 31.27 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 0.01 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.21 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | — |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 0.10 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | — |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, WLD shows RSI 49.02 with trend bias bearish, while Optimism sits at RSI 31.27 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | WLD | OP |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | 0.00 |
| Github activity | — | 0.00 |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
WLD
Optimism
Pros and cons
Pros of WLD
- WLD typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- WLD has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
Cons of WLD
- Crowded positioning around WLD sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Indicator stacks on WLD may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Large-cap status for WLD can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of Optimism
- If technical momentum aligns, Optimism may outperform on medium-term windows.
- PEPS tracking for Optimism still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Diversifying versus WLD with Optimism can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of Optimism
- Relative underperformance versus WLD can persist through entire market regimes.
- Trend failures on Optimism often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to WLD, while short-term performance leans toward WLD. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
For readers asking which is “better”, the honest answer is conditional. WLD and Optimism solve overlapping but not identical market jobs. On-chain and developer fields, when available, add slower-moving context beneath the tape. Missing fundamentals should be treated as unknown, not as zeros. If your thesis is long-term adoption, weight fundamentals and liquidity; if tactical, weight trend/momentum — and always define invalidation.
FAQ
Which is better, WLD or Optimism?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. WLD leads on market cap today, while WLD leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, WLD or OP?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both WLD and Optimism.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. WLD currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is WLD, but longer windows can disagree.