Overview
This page compares USDY and Cosmos Hub with live PEPS metrics. Rankings (#40 vs #85) and liquidity profiles differ, so traders often use them for distinct roles rather than as perfect substitutes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | USDY | ATOM |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,882.43 | $1.27 |
| Market Cap | $2.15B | $723.29M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.90M | $1.46M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 40.00 | 85.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +4.22% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | USDY | ATOM |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.10% | +3.35% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | USDY | ATOM |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 18.97 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 0.05 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 51.19 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | — |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1.61 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | — |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Use the indicator table as a checklist: if momentum and trend align on one asset while the other diverges, relative-value setups become more interesting — still without certainty.
Fundamentals
| Metric | USDY | ATOM |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | 0.00 |
| Github activity | — | 1,299.00 |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
USDY
Cosmos Hub
Pros and cons
Pros of USDY
- Market-cap scale on USDY may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- USDY often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- USDY has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- USDY typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of USDY
- Indicator stacks on USDY may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Crowded positioning around USDY sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Large-cap status for USDY can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of Cosmos Hub
- PEPS tracking for Cosmos Hub still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- If technical momentum aligns, Cosmos Hub may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Diversifying versus USDY with Cosmos Hub can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Cosmos Hub can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of Cosmos Hub
- Relative underperformance versus USDY can persist through entire market regimes.
- Higher volatility on ATOM cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Trend failures on Cosmos Hub often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
Statistically, higher market cap (USDY) often correlates with deeper books, while hotter 24h prints (Cosmos Hub) can fade. Position sizing should reflect that uncertainty.
AI summary
For readers asking which is “better”, the honest answer is conditional. USDY and Cosmos Hub solve overlapping but not identical market jobs. On-chain and developer fields, when available, add slower-moving context beneath the tape. Missing fundamentals should be treated as unknown, not as zeros. If your thesis is long-term adoption, weight fundamentals and liquidity; if tactical, weight trend/momentum — and always define invalidation.
FAQ
Which is better, USDY or Cosmos Hub?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. USDY leads on market cap today, while Cosmos Hub leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, USDY or ATOM?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both USDY and Cosmos Hub.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. USDY currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Cosmos Hub, but longer windows can disagree.