Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means OHM and 1INCH are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | OHM | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,882.65 | $0.081400 |
| Market Cap | $279.86M | $114.51M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $89,336.00 | $360,111.27 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 128.00 | 234.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | OHM | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.80% | +0.87% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | OHM | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for OHM/1INCH currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | OHM | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
OHM
1INCH
Pros and cons
Pros of OHM
- OHM has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- OHM often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Composite PEPS readings for OHM can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of OHM
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit OHM harder simply because it is more visible.
- Indicator stacks on OHM may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of 1INCH
- Diversifying versus OHM with 1INCH can change portfolio factor exposure.
- 1INCH can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Narrative optionality around 1INCH can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of 1INCH
- Trend failures on 1INCH often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for 1INCH.
- Higher volatility on 1INCH cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for OHM on size and 1INCH on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. OHM holds market-cap $279.86M and rank #128; 1INCH shows $114.51M and #234. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch 1INCH. Where durability matters, watch OHM. AI composite scores (56.80/56.80) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, OHM or 1INCH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. OHM leads on market cap today, while 1INCH leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, OHM or 1INCH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both OHM and 1INCH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. 1INCH currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is 1INCH, but longer windows can disagree.