Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means JUP and NEO are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | JUP | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.194700 | $1.82 |
| Market Cap | $647.36M | $128.59M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.62M | $103,695.55 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 87.00 | 215.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | JUP | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.83% | -0.16% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | JUP | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across JUP and NEO, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | JUP | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
JUP
NEO
Pros and cons
Pros of JUP
- Higher ranking for JUP can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- JUP typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- JUP has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
Cons of JUP
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit JUP harder simply because it is more visible.
- Large-cap status for JUP can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Crowded positioning around JUP sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- When dominance narratives fade, JUP can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of NEO
- Diversifying versus JUP with NEO can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Narrative optionality around NEO can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- PEPS tracking for NEO still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of NEO
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for NEO.
- Higher volatility on NEO cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave NEO more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. JUP and NEO can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
For readers asking which is “better”, the honest answer is conditional. JUP and NEO solve overlapping but not identical market jobs. On-chain and developer fields, when available, add slower-moving context beneath the tape. Missing fundamentals should be treated as unknown, not as zeros. If your thesis is long-term adoption, weight fundamentals and liquidity; if tactical, weight trend/momentum — and always define invalidation.
FAQ
Which is better, JUP or NEO?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. JUP leads on market cap today, while JUP leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, JUP or NEO?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both JUP and NEO.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. JUP currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is JUP, but longer windows can disagree.