Overview
NEAR Protocol vs USDY is one of the most watched crypto matchups. Beyond headline prices, this comparison blends market structure, technical readings and probabilistic context without promising outcomes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | NEAR | USDY |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.71 | $1,882.43 |
| Market Cap | $2.35B | $2.15B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $15.58M | $1.90M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 39.00 | 40.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +6.14% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | NEAR | USDY |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +2.40% | +0.10% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | NEAR | USDY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 37.84 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 0.10 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 13.80 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1.61 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1.88 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | neutral | bearish |
| Momentum | — | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across NEAR Protocol and USDY, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | NEAR | USDY |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 103.00 | — |
| Github activity | 2,590.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
NEAR Protocol
USDY
Pros and cons
Pros of NEAR Protocol
- Higher ranking for NEAR Protocol can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Composite PEPS readings for NEAR Protocol can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- NEAR often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of NEAR Protocol
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit NEAR Protocol harder simply because it is more visible.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- When dominance narratives fade, NEAR Protocol can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of USDY
- Diversifying versus NEAR Protocol with USDY can change portfolio factor exposure.
- USDY can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Active volume bursts on USDY sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of USDY
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave USDY more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Trend failures on USDY often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Higher volatility on USDY cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for USDY.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. NEAR Protocol and USDY can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. NEAR Protocol holds market-cap $2.35B and rank #39; USDY shows $2.15B and #40. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch NEAR Protocol. Where durability matters, watch NEAR Protocol. AI composite scores (44.60/58.20) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, NEAR Protocol or USDY?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. NEAR Protocol leads on market cap today, while NEAR Protocol leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, NEAR or USDY?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both NEAR Protocol and USDY.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. NEAR Protocol currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is NEAR Protocol, but longer windows can disagree.