Overview
JUP and MX rarely move in perfect sync. Today’s print ($0.193300/$1,865.83) and 24h leaders (MX) help frame which side currently carries relative strength.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | JUP | MX |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.193300 | $1,865.83 |
| Market Cap | $641.70M | $148.08M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.50M | $2.49M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 88.00 | 197.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | JUP | MX |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -1.48% | -0.20% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | JUP | MX |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 60.00 | 60.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, JUP shows RSI 54.31 with trend bias bearish, while MX sits at RSI 54.31 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | JUP | MX |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
JUP
MX
Pros and cons
Pros of JUP
- JUP often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Higher ranking for JUP can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of JUP
- Crowded positioning around JUP sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- When dominance narratives fade, JUP can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of MX
- PEPS tracking for MX still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Diversifying versus JUP with MX can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of MX
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Relative underperformance versus JUP can persist through entire market regimes.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for MX.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to JUP, while short-term performance leans toward MX. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. JUP holds market-cap $641.70M and rank #88; MX shows $148.08M and #197. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch MX. Where durability matters, watch JUP. AI composite scores (58.20/58.20) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, JUP or MX?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. JUP leads on market cap today, while MX leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, JUP or MX?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both JUP and MX.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. MX currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is MX, but longer windows can disagree.